Loading...
Advisory Opinion 1992-165
South Carolina State Ethics Commission
South Carolina State Ethics Commission
Files
Loading...
PDF file
Adobe PDF, 59.51 KB
Abstract
The spouse of a city council member may continue as an employee of the city without violating the Ethics Reform Act. The council member may vote on general salary increases for city employees but may not participate in personnel issues or salary raises
for the family member which are not general personnel policies or general salary increases.
Issue Date
5/27/1992
Keywords
South Carolina State Ethics Commission, Advisory opinions--South Carolina, Nepotism--Law and legislation--South Carolina, City council members--South Carolina
Type
Periodical
Rights
Copyright status determined to be in the public domain on April 27, 2020 by United States Supreme Court ruling (Georgia et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. : 590 U.S.__(2020))
Digitization Specifications
This South Carolina State Document was either saved from a document available publicly online in PDF format or converted to PDF using Adobe Acrobat DC.